Plandemic InDoctorNation – FACT CHECK an in-depth analysis. Part 2
September 3rd, 2021. by Stephen Phillips
We continue Plandemic InDoctorNation – FACT-CHECK an in-depth analysis Part 2 with the Plandemic InDoctorNation documentary itself. in addition to user independent verifiable source links and time codes available below the video!
Verified Sources From Video(With Clickable Video Seek Time Stamps, Source Url, and Source Links for reader and/or user independent verification checking):
Plandemic InDoctorNation FACT CHECK – An In Depth Analysis PART 2!
I have personally been able to Verify 98% of the sources Cited In This Documentary Film. Almost all of these sources are public domain and as such i have provided source links. In addition to time codes and source domains for each directly below the video for user independent verification. I will address and cover each of these sources and what i found in chronological order as they appear in the film. In addition to a fact check rating. Following that will be the final Fact Check Assessment and Conclusion for this story!
For the first source of Plandemic InDoctorNation Fact-Check Part 2 We Have the CDC is not an independent govt agency, it is a PRIVATELY owned subsidiary of Big Pharma Article
featured in the documentary. First off we can easily verify that it is a real article online and does exist as presented in the documentary. According to the CDC is not an independent govt agency, it is a PRIVATELY owned subsidiary of Big Pharma article…
There are CDC patents applicable to vaccines for Flu, Rotavirus, Hepatitis A, HIV, Anthrax, Rabies, Dengue fever, West Nile virus, Group A Strep, Pneumococcal disease, Meningococcal disease, RSV, Gastroenteritis, Japanese encephalitis, SARS, Rift Valley Fever, and chlamydophila pneumoniae.
Quote from CDC is not an independent govt agency, it is a PRIVATELY owned subsidiary of Big Pharma
There is a CDC patent for “Nucleic acid vaccines for prevention of flavivirus infection,” which has applications in vaccines for Zika, West Nile virus, Dengue fever, tick-borne encephalitis virus, yellow fever, Palm Creek virus, and Parramatta River virus.
Quote from CDC is not an independent govt agency, it is a PRIVATELY owned subsidiary of Big Pharma
For easy user independent investigation, fact checking, and verification we have provided the pdf files for each patent referenced above. In addition to screenshots of this source from the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary Film and the web. As a result of the implications of these patents we have taken the liberty of hosting copies on our domain which can be accessed below.
Chlamydophila Pneumoniae – pdf
Plandemic InDoctorNation – FACT-CHECK Part 2 Rating:
Due to the fact that the article is as presented in the Plandemic InDoctorNation documentary. As well as the fact that we are able to independently verify the patents mentioned in the article do exist. However it should be noted that further investigation is needed to verify that the patents are what the article claims. We Rate this As
HIGH PROBABILITY OF ACCURACY
Our Second Source For Plandemic InDoctorNation Fact-Check Part 2 Is From the House Intelligence Committee Hearing 1975 also known as The Church Committee
The first thing to be noted is the fact that we are able to verify independently that the Church Committee Hearings Did Occur. Which led to the Church Committee Reports, of which there are 14 in all. We can verify this through 2 primary sources. The first being through the Assassination Archives and Research Center Website. The second being through The Wikimedia Foundation where they have historical archives of the Church Committee Reports Book I & Book II.
Plandemic InDoctorNation – FACT-CHECK Part 2 Rating:
In light of the fact that we were able to verify the existence and occurrence of the Church Committee Hearings. Most importantly through both the Assassination Archives and Research Center Website website as well as the Wikimedia Foundation Website. We Rate This As
TRUE
Next We Have The Telecommunications Act Of 1996 Source For Our Plandemic InDoctorNation Fact-Check Part 2
We can easily verify that the Telecommunications Act Of 1996 did occur and was passed in the year 1996. As far as the claim that “it was the Telecommunications Act of 1996 that opened the door for predatory corporations to monopolize the industries of print and broadcast.” I Would like to point out a source not mentioned directly in the Plandemic InDoctorNation documentary that puts that claim in a greater and clearer context. That source is regarding the Repeal of Net Neutrality in 2018 By the F.C.C. and is from Wikipedia.
Below Are Some Important Quotes From That Source. The First Is From Paragraph 1 Of The Net Neutrality in the United States Source and states as follows
In the United States, net neutrality, the principle that Internet service providers (ISPs) treat all data on the Internet the same, and not discriminate, has been an issue of contention between network users and access providers since the 1990s.[1][2][3] With net neutrality, ISPs may not intentionally block, slow down, or charge money for specific online content. Without net neutrality, ISPs may prioritize certain types of traffic, meter others, or potentially block traffic from specific services, while charging consumers for various tiers of service.[citation needed]
From Net Neutrality in the United States Paragraph 1 courtesy Wikipedia
The Second Fact In Our Chain Of Evidence Is From The 2nd Paragraph Of The Same Source And Reads
A core issue to net neutrality is how ISPs should be classified under the Communications Act of 1934, as Title I “information services” or Title II “common carrier services”. The classification affects the Federal Communications Commission‘s (FCC) authority over ISPs: the FCC would have significant ability to regulate ISPs if classified as Title II common carriers, but would have little control over them if classified as Title I.
From Net Neutrality in the United States Paragraph 2 courtesy Wikipedia
The Third Fact From This Source For Our Fact-Check Is From The 3rd Paragraph. And Reads As Follows
In 2005, the FCC adopted network neutrality principles “to preserve and promote the vibrant and open character of the Internet as the telecommunications marketplace enters the broadband age.” Between 2005 and 2012, five attempts to pass bills in Congress containing net neutrality provisions failed. Opponents claimed that these bills would have benefited industry lobbyists instead of consumers. In response to legal challenges from ISPs challenging the FCC’s ability to set net neutrality principles, the FCC in 2015 issued the Open Internet Order which reclassified ISPs as Title II services and giving them clear authority to enforce net neutrality. The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld the FCC’s new rules in a legal challenge raised by advocate groups representing ISPs.
From Net Neutrality in the United States Paragraph 3 courtesy Wikipedia
The Following Quote Is The Most Important And Relevant Of the 4 Facts Cited For This Source For Our Fact-Check
Upon becoming FCC chairman in April 2017 as part of the Trump Administration, Ajit Pai proposed to repeal the neutrality policies, returning to the previous classification of ISPs as Title I services. The draft of the proposed repeal, published in May 2017, led to over 20 million comments to the FCC. Despite a majority of these favoring retaining the 2015 Open Internet Order, the FCC still voted in favor of repealing the Order, which went into effect in June 2018 despite efforts in Congress to stay the repeal.[4] Several states and Internet service providers challenged this ruling, and while the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in early October 2019 that the FCC has the ability to reclassify ISPs as Title I or II and allowing the rule change to stand, the Court also ruled that the FCC cannot block state or local-level net neutrality enforcement.
From Net Neutrality in the United States Paragraph 4 courtesy Wikipedia
I Would Like To Point Out That Because Of Fact that Net Neutrality Has Been Repealed In The United States Many Consumers Have Been Adversely Affected.
I have experienced first hand immediately after the repeal of net neutrality the following. Throttling of our data by our ISP. In addition to the jacking up of fees and prices when going over the Bandwidth Quota for the month. (It is important to note that before the repeal of Net Neutrality Our ISP Had No Such Bandwidth Quotas. And they never throttled our data either.) I have since completely gotten rid of my cable as a direct result of this to try and offset the cost. The telecom companies are clearly taking complete advantage of consumers because of this. However due to there no longer being any proper oversight they can now legally get away with all of these tactics they now employ to make a profit at the expense of the Consumer.
Plandemic InDoctorNation – FACT-CHECK Part 2 Rating:
We can see the result of the repeal of net neutrality over the last few of years on consumers. Clearly this is in alignment with the claim and quote mentioned in the Plandemic InDoctorNation documentary. However because of the fact that we are unable to verify this claim directly from the Telecommunications Act of 1996 Itself. We Rate This As
HIGH PROBABILITY OF ACCURACY
The Next Source For Our Plandemic InDoctorNation – FACT-CHECK Part 2 Is The Bayh-Dole Act – PATENT RIGHTS IN INVENTIONS MADE WITH FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
The claim from the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary says what the Bayh-Dole Act did was it “Allowed recipients of federal funding to patent and retain economic interest in the research that the public paid for.” I was easily able to find the original Bay-Dole Act Document converted to pdf format from the GovInfo.Gov website. The section pertaining to PATENT RIGHTS IN INVENTIONS MADE WITH FEDERAL ASSISTANCE is on page 5 of the provided pdf link. More importantly we are able to confirm the claim made after reading page 5 of the Bay-Dole Act pdf Document. It clearly confirms that Discoveries and Inventions Made with the help of federal funding can be retained financially by the discoverers or inventors.
Plandemic InDoctorNation – FACT-CHECK Part 2 Rating:
Because we have been able to verify that the Bayh-Dole Act was passed and did indeed exist. In addition to the fact that we are able to confirm the claim being made by the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary through the Bay-Dole Act PDF Document. We Rate This As
TRUE
The Next Source Mentioned In Our Plandemic InDoctorNation – FACT-CHECK Part 2 Is The GPMB Global Preparedness Monitoring Board Annual Report 2019
I have easily been able to verify that the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board Annual Report for 2019 does exist. Furthermore i can confirm that the GPMB Annual Report for 2019 is as presented in the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary. Included below are screenshots of the GPMB Annual Report for 2019 from both the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary and the web.
Plandemic InDoctorNation – FACT-CHECK Part 2 Rating:
We were very easily able to verify that the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board Annual Report for 2019 does exist. As well as the GPMB Annual Report for 2019 PDF. In addition to the fact that it is as presented in the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary. Therefore, We Rate This As
TRUE
Our Next Source For Our Plandemic InDoctorNation Fact-Check Part 2 Is The MEMBERS OF THE GLOBAL PREPAREDNESS MONITORING BOARD
I was quickly able to confirm that the Members Of The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board are exactly who the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary claims they are. In addition to the fact that every bit of text presented in the Documentary regarding these members is accurate. Below are screenshots of the Members Of The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board From both the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary and the web.
Plandemic InDoctorNation – FACT-CHECK Part 2 Rating:
For the reasons mentioned above. We Therefore Rate This As
TRUE
Next We Have The REQUIRED ACTIONS Countries, donors and multilateral institutions must be prepared for the worst From The GPMB Annual 2019 Report Source For Our Plandemic InDoctorNation – Fact-Check Part 2
I have also been able to confirm that the REQUIRED ACTIONS Countries, donors and multilateral institutions must be prepared for the worst claim made in the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary is completely 100% accurate. Included below are screenshots of this From both the Documentary and the web.
Plandemic InDoctorNation – FACT-CHECK Part 2 Rating:
For the reasons pointed out above. We Therefore Rate This As
TRUE
Finally We Have The PREPARING FOR THE WORST: From The GPMB Annual 2019 Report Source For Our Plandemic InDoctorNation – Fact-Check Part 2
I have been able to clearly verify that this section of the GPMB 2019 Annual Report is indeed correct. In addition to the claim “Two global pandemic preparedness exercises have to be completed. And one of them has to be done on the release of a respiratory pathogen.” which is as presented in the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary. And most importantly can be verified in the GPMB 2019 Annual Report on Page 39 Paragraph 2. Below are screenshots of the GPMB 2019 Annual Report Preparing For The Worst from both the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary as well as the web. Also included below those is a screenshot of the GPMB 2019 Annual Report on Page 39 Paragraph 2
Plandemic InDoctorNation – FACT-CHECK Part 2 Rating:
Due to the fact that we can verify that the GPMB 2019 Annual Report Preparing For The Worst exists and is accurately presented in the documentary. In addition to being able to verify the claim “Two global pandemic preparedness exercises have to be completed. And one of them has to be done on the release of a respiratory pathogen.” in the GPMB 2019 Annual Report on Page 39 Paragraph 2. Due To This. We Rate This As
TRUE
Next Up We Have The Clade X Exercise Source For Our Plandemic InDoctorNation – Fact-Check Part 2
I was able to quickly verify the Clade X Exercise source from the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary. Through the Center For Health Security Website just as easily as i was able for the Event 201 Source.
Plandemic InDoctorNation – FACT-CHECK Part 2 Rating:
In consequence of the ease at which we were able to verify the Clade X Exercise source. We Rate This As
TRUE
The Next Source On Our List For Our Plandemic InDoctorNation – Fact-Check Part 2 Is Scenarios for the FUTURE of TECHNOLOGY and International Development – Scenario Narratives – LOCKSTEP
Scenarios for the FUTURE of TECHNOLOGY and International Development – Scenario Narratives – LOCKSTEP. This is another easily verifiable document and i can confirm it exists. In addition to being accurately presented in the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary.
Plandemic InDoctorNation – FACT-CHECK Part 2 Rating:
Due to the fact we can not only verify the Document for our source exists. As well as confirm it is accurately presented in the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary. We Rate This As
TRUE
Next Up We Have The China’s government was not the only one Page From The Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development Source For Our Plandemic InDoctorNation – Fact-Check Part 2
This portion of the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary i was also easily able to confirm. Below is the relevant quote from the Documentary
China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified.
From the Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development pdf page 19
Plandemic InDoctorNation – FACT-CHECK Part 2 Rating:
As a result of the fact that we can verify this page exists in the Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development. In addition to the fact that it is accurately presented in the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary. Therefore We Rate This As
TRUE
Next Up We Have The United Nations In Coordination with the World Economic Forum The Great Reset: Revitalizing Global Partnerships Source For Our Plandemic InDoctorNation – Fact-Check Part 2
I was easily able to verify and confirm that the Great Reset is in fact real. In addition to the fact that it is presented accurately in the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary. Below is a screenshot of the webpage from the provided source link. We encourage you to check out the source for yourself and make up your own mind.
Plandemic InDoctorNation – FACT-CHECK Part 2 Rating:
Clearly we can see through the World Economic Forum website that The Great Reset is a real agenda. As well as being able to verify that it is accurately presented in the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary. Therefore We Rate This As
TRUE
Up Next We Have The Klaus Schwab Source For Our Plandemic InDoctorNation – Fact-Check Part 2
I was easily able to verify that Klaus Schwab is a real person. As well as confirm that he did indeed author the book COVID-19: The Great Reset.
Plandemic InDoctorNation – FACT-CHECK Part 2 Rating:
Because of the fact that we have been able to verify that Klaus Schwab is a real person. As well as the fact we can verify he authored the book COVID-19: The Great Reset. In addition to the fact that he is portrayed accurately in the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary. We Rate This As
TRUE
The Final Source For Our Plandemic InDoctorNation – Fact-Check Part 2 is AP Exclusive: Health agency spends more on travel than AIDS
I was also easily able to verify the AP Exclusive: Health agency spends more on travel than AIDS source from the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary. In addition to being able to confirm that it is presented accurately and in context in the documentary. Due to this fact we have provided screenshots which link to the source for user independent verification.
Plandemic InDoctorNation – FACT-CHECK Part 2 Rating:
We were able to confirm that the AP Exclusive: Health agency spends more on travel than AIDS article source exists. As well as being presented accurately in the Plandemic InDoctorNation Documentary. Therefore We Rate This As
TRUE
Continue on to Part 3 of Plandemic InDoctorNation Fact–Check An in depth analysis.
